<!--pageType= magazinesmallslug= st_essaysection= culturesubsection= culturereviewsheadline= The Critics Need a Reboot. The Internet &ltcite&gtHasn't Led Us Into a New Dark Age.authorName= David WolmancreditType= photocredit= Mauricio Alejo-->&ltp>&ltstrong&gtWhen in doubt, blame the latest technology. Socrates thought the advent of writing would wreak havoc on the powers of the mind. Christian theologians denounced the printing press as the work of the devil. The invention of the telephone was supposed to make letter-writing extinct, and the arrival of the train &ampmdash; and later the car and plane &ampmdash; was going to be the death of community.&ltp&gtNow comes a technological bogeyman for the 21st century, this one responsible for a supposed sharp uptick in American shallowness and credulity: the Internet and its digital spawn. Witness the wave of books and essays implicating the wired world in a sudden rise in uncritical thinking and attention deficits. In a recent &ltcite&gtAtlantic Monthly cover story, Nicholas Carr asks: "Is Google Making Us Stupid" A: No, but it makes a handy scapegoat for an inability to cope with information overload. Lee Siegel's &ltcite&gtAgainst the Machine: Being Human in the Age of the Electronic Mob suggests that the Web makes us both moronic and narcissistic not that a moron can be expected to know what a narcissist is. Maggie Jackson's &ltcite&gtDistracted: The Erosion of Attention and the Coming Dark Age is a tiresome indictment of multitasking. And in &ltcite&gtThe Dumbest Generation: How the Digital Age Stupefies Young Americans and Jeopardizes Our Future Or, Don't Trust Anyone Under 30, Mark Bauerlein delivers a grim assessment of the state of young minds, rattling off statistics about faltering education and using such figures to buttress his assertion that the Internet, videogames, and IMs all serve to numb and dumb.&ltp&gtTo be sure, there is plenty of evidence that ignorance and irrationalism are rampant. Pernicious fallacies have found a purchase among educated people who ought to know better: Vaccines cause autism, Saddam Hussein was behind the attacks of 9/11, power lines give you cancer, cell phones kill honeybees, and global warming is a scam orchestrated by tree-hugging liberals.&ltp&gtYes, it must be acknowledged that the Web provides remarkably easy access to such bogus ideas. On top of that, there's the human tendency to seek out information that supports preexisting assumptions, a behavior psychologists have dubbed homophily. The Web magnifies this echo-chamber effect.&ltp&gtBut the latest crop of curmudgeons fail to acknowledge that there is not much new in this parade of the preposterous. The US has a long and colorful history of being taken in by the erroneous and irrational: Salem witches, the "War of the Worlds" radio broadcast, phrenology, and eugenics are just a few choice examples. The truth is that Americans often approach information &ampmdash; online and off &ampmdash; with a particular mindset. "Antirational junk thought has gained social respectability in the United States during the past half century," notes Susan Jacoby in &ltcite&gtThe Age of American Unreason. "It has proved resistant to the vast expansion of scientific knowledge that has taken place during the same period." Jacoby argues that long-standing American values like rugged individualism and the need to question authority have metastasized into reflexive anti-intellectualism and disdain for "eggheads," "elites," and pretty much anyone who might be described as credentialed. This cancerous irrationalism isn't pretty, but it isn't technology's fault, either.&ltp&gtOn the contrary: The explosion of knowledge represented by the Internet and abetted by all sorts of digital technologies makes us more productive and gives us the opportunity to become smarter, not dumber. Think of Wikipedia and its emergent spinoffs, like Wiktionary. Imperfect as they may be, the collective brainpower contained within these kinds of sites &ampmdash; and the hunger for learning and accurate information they represent &ampmdash; is something human history has never known before. Even &ltcite&gtEncyclopedia Britannica will soon be accepting user contributions. Or consider the Public Library of Science: By breaking the publishing industry's choke hold on the circulation of scientific information, this powerful online resource arms scientists and the masses alike with the same data, accelerating new discoveries and breakthroughs. Not exactly the kind of effect one would expect from a technology that's threatening to turn us into philistines.&ltp&gtIt's naive to think that the digital age will magically remedy stupidity. We need better schools as well as a renewed commitment to reason and scientific rigor so that people can distinguish knowledge from garbage. The Web is not an obstacle in this project. It's an unparalleled tool for generating, finding, and sharing sound information. What's moronic is to assume that it hurts us more than it helps.&ltp>&ltem&gtDavid Wolman &lta href="http://www.davidwolman.com"&gtdavidwolman.com &ltem&gtwrote about new ways of viewing autism in Wired &ltem&gtissue 16.03.&ltbr style="clear: both;"/> &ltimg alt="" style="border: 0; height:1px; width:1px;" border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdoi=eaf93b046a460c660403a781a67fea12" height="1" />&ltimg src="http://www.pheedo.com/feeds/tracker.phpi=eaf93b046a460c660403a781a67fea12" style="display: none;" border="0" height="1" alt=""/>&ltp>&lta href="http://feeds.wired.com/~a/wired/culturea=cjSJca">&ltimg src="http://feeds.wired.com/~a/wired/culturei=cjSJca" border="0">&ltdiv class="feedflare">&lta href="http://feeds.wired.com/~f/wired/culturea=zwiutK">&ltimg src="http://feeds.wired.com/~f/wired/culturei=zwiutK" border="0"> &lta href="http://feeds.wired.com/~f/wired/culturea=fkE1Xk">&ltimg src="http://feeds.wired.com/~f/wired/culturei=fkE1Xk" border="0"> &lta href="http://feeds.wired.com/~f/wired/culturea=qZdJCk">&ltimg src="http://feeds.wired.com/~f/wired/culturei=qZdJCk" border="0"> &lta href="http://feeds.wired.com/~f/wired/culturea=IeVrvK">&ltimg src="http://feeds.wired.com/~f/wired/culturei=IeVrvK" border="0">&ltimg src="http://feeds.wired.com/~r/wired/culture/~4/368693324" height="1" />